Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491268 --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl <[email protected]> 2009-03-20 19:28:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Revoking approval. This issue needs further discussion. Ralf, I might be missing something here, but in claiming to revoke a properly granted package approval I'm pretty sure you're way overstepping your authority. I clearly have a vested interest in this matter (given that this is a package I submitted for review), but, absent actual malfeasance, I've never seen anything like your behaviour here before. I'm certainly happy to discuss the merits of this with you, preferably on fedora-perl-devel-list, but Miroslav is correct: the module is (AFAICT) fungible with core Fatal (except without respect to autodie); and if someone doesn't want it, it's certainly not mandated. I fail to see the impact here... Especially as: "Fatal has been obsoleted by the new autodie pragma. Please use autodie in preference to Fatal. autodie supports lexical scoping, throws real exception objects, and provides much nicer error messages." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
