Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226376 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola <[email protected]> 2009-03-21 18:16:02 EDT --- rpmlint output: rootfiles.noarch: W: no-documentation rootfiles.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /root/.bashrc rootfiles.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /root/.cshrc rootfiles.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /root/.tcshrc rootfiles.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /root/.bash_logout rootfiles.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /root/.bash_profile rootfiles.noarch: W: no-url-tag rootfiles.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /root/.bash_logout rootfiles.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /root/.bash_profile rootfiles.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /root/.bashrc rootfiles.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /root/.cshrc rootfiles.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /root/.tcshrc rootfiles.src: W: no-%build-section rootfiles.src: W: no-url-tag 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings. All of these except the url tag warning are fine due to the special nature of the package. - For the url tag, add the disclaimer available at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#We_are_Upstream to the spec file. - Add %{?dist} to the release tag. - Preserve time stamps with install -p. After these are fixed the package is good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
