Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256





--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla <[email protected]>  2009-03-24 11:03:41 EDT ---
Ok on the docs, names and ldconfig.  

Re: the license, I thought if using a GPLed library, the GPL version of the
code must be >= the GPL version of the library?  Or so I have that wrong?  Or
do the +s moot the whole thing?  

Re: the patches, so essentially these allow us to work around an upstream
limitation that upstream will be fixing in another manner?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to