Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490399 Xan López <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #6 from Xan López <[email protected]> 2009-04-03 09:52:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > 1. I'm a bit confused by what package name we should use here. > > domain: webkitgtk.org > content on website: WebKitGTK+ > link to source on website: WebKitGTK+ > tar file downloaded: webkit-1.1.3.tar.gz > > So, the choices seem to be 'WebKitGTK+', 'webkit', 'webkitgtk'. > Can you please ask upstream what the desired package name should be? > Along with what case? ;) The 'official' name of the project is WebKitGTK+, but I'd say that's a weird name for a package name. IMHO webkitgtk would be the best option. It's a bit similar to GNU Emacs and 'emacs' as package name. And yeah, we should not name our tarball just 'webkit' :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
