Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #11 from Gianluca Sforna <[email protected]> 2009-04-07 02:58:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Some updates (new spec / srpm has been uploaded) Ok, please remember to bump the release number when you upload a new spec/srpm so I can be sure I'm looking at an updated spec file. > - been working w/ the anyterm upstream community to get some changes > committed, > including some necessary bugfixes, new features, and integration w/ httpd. > After this no patches / additional changes should be needed for this Great > > - because of the previous I don't think anyterm 1.1.29 tarball from the site > will cut it, so we'll need to either source this from the version control > checkout tarball, or (less preferably) wait for the next release Packaging a SVN checkout is OK; what is (still) not good is that I can't verify your tarball matches upstream. If you want to stick to a svn snapshot until the next release, please pick a suitable revision from upstream, then package it with "svn export -r" and be sure to update the package version field according to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
