Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469514 --- Comment #23 from Javier Palacios <[email protected]> 2009-04-07 15:23:26 EDT --- Sorry, I'been quite busy for a few weeks, and had tons of email without opening. I have no problem with Ruben taking up the package, although I personally don't like to use macros for obvious commands. The reason that actually did stopped this review was basically the one from comment 8 from Ralf Corsepius, as well as comment 9. That two lines patch was intended to clean the circular dependency on debmirror.conf, exactly the same that Ruben cleaned with the block starting at # filter file dependency on debmirror.conf If the patch (which I believe much cleaner) is not acceptable, I don't see why this other way is. (just in case, the patch only prevents debmirror.conf to be detected as dependency, and if the file is there it is still read) Regarding the current developement, it is basically dead. According to debian information pages, the current maintainer of the package is Goswin von Brederlow, also listed as current author, but the email does not currently work. So there is no chance on including the patch in upstream version, as suggested on comment 13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
