Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 Tom "spot" Callaway <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway <[email protected]> 2009-04-14 14:14:05 EDT --- The additional clause in the MIT license is a request, not a requirement. Accordingly, it is not a problem. Since the MIT code is compiled together with GPLv3+ code, you do not need to mention it in the License tag (the GPLv3+ terms are more restrictive), unless you wish to do so. License: GPLv3+ is fine. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
