Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libast - handy routines and drop-in substitutes for some good-but-non-portable functions (needed by eterm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182175 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-02 16:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Sorry, should've specified. libast 0.7.1 in CVS has a LICENSE file. You can > pull the tarball from the cAos SRPM if you'd like: > http://mirror.caosity.org/cAos-2/ext/autobuilder/i386/00_LOGS/e/libast/SRPMS/libast-0.7.1-0.20060818.src.rpm Thanks, new package available: SPEC: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~terjeros/eterm/libast.spec SRPM: http://web.phys.ntnu.no/~terjeros/eterm/libast-0.7.1-0.1.20060818cvs.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
