Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682


Tom "spot" Callaway <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
             Blocks|                            |182235(FE-Legal)




--- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway <[email protected]>  2009-04-28 
16:51:25 EDT ---
Looking at those files:

crc.c: BSD [OK]
hsieh_hash.c: New license [Checking with RH Legal]
jenkins_hash.c: Copyright Only (I will interpret "Do NOT use for cryptographic
purposes." as advice after the license, rather than license terms, since it
conflicts with "You may use this code any way you wish". The upstream for this
file should really change that line to say "We do not recommend that you use
this code for cryptographic purposes.") [OK]
md5.c: BSD [OK]
murmur_hash.c: Public Domain [OK] (They really should have a proper declaration
for PD on their website, but I'll let it slide)

As soon as I hear back on the hsieh licensing, I'll comment.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to