Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499049 Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt <[email protected]> 2009-05-05 11:15:52 EDT --- * Would be fine to name it "ExpatImpl" with no main package but a -devel subpackage. There are no guidelines that require the name to be converted to lower-case. * Licensing situation is unclear. Upstream .zip doesn't contain or mention the BSD licence that is specified in the .spec file. There's just a copyright notice in the single C++ header file. In the upstream msg boards the authors writes: | By definition, all code posted to CodeProject is free to use. | These days I use the BSD non-adware license. | So feel free to use the code as you wish. | | [...] | | Tim Smith "Free to use" doesn't imply "BSD". Though, if you choose the BSD licence for the Fedora package, an added explanation would be good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
