Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #14 from Chitlesh GOORAH <[email protected]> 2009-05-07 17:53:30 EDT --- #1 (In reply to comment #10) > - Also blas-devel is unnecessary since it's pulled in by lapack-devel. Conrad, here blas-devel is already required by lapack-devel, you can verify this with chitlesh $ rpm -qR lapack-devel blas-devel = 3.1.1-4.fc10 <----------- here it is lapack = 3.1.1-4.fc10 liblapack.so.3 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Hence, if it is not important to add it in the spec file. For your next package, use this "rpm -qR XXXX" command to verify where you have unnecessary added redundant dependencies. #2 verify your rpms there is a package caled "rpmlint". It helps you verify the quality of your rpms. Try rpmlint -i XXXX.rpm for each generated rpms before uploading for review. Any warning or errors should be corrected. The solutions of some common rpmlint warnings are listed on the fedora wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
