Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <[email protected]> 2009-05-11 11:51:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > The file as included in the source tarball has three license statements: > > 1. Apache 2.0 > 2. BSD with advertising > 3. OpenSSL > Yes there is also that third statement, Openssl. > So when compiling this (Apache 2.0 or BSD with advertising or OpenSSL) with > all > the other files which are Apache 2.0 the resulting binary is Apache 2.0. At this point I can't be sure if we should regard this as "X or Y or Z". Why is it not "X and Y and Z"? I don't see an indication of either convention in the source. Shall we ask FE-Legal? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
