Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fed...@gmail.com> 2009-05-27 12:49:35 EDT --- Tank you. The licensing guideline says "If neither the source, nor the upstream composed documentation says anything about the license version, then it could be under _ANY_ version of the GPL. The version listed in COPYING is irrelevant from this perspective. Technically it could be under any license, but if all we have to go by is COPYING, we'll use COPYING to imply that it is under the GPL, all versions (GPL+)." That's why I used GPL+. Please see case #4 at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ I already asked Hermann to include the GPL version in the source headers a while ago (around guitarix-0.04-2) but he didn't do it. I guess we will have to live with what we have. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
