Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 --- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert <[email protected]> 2009-05-31 06:37:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > - "BuildRequires: gnome-doc-utils" seems wrong to me, AFAIKS only gtkdoc-check > from gtk-doc is needed. > > Well, thats what you think. Had you tried to build in mock, like I did, you'd > see that gnome-doc-utils is needed for the build to succeed. > > - This is the successor of PolicyKit-gnome, but the Provides and Obsoletes for > it are missing. > > You want us to break rawhide until all the porting is done ? Really ? No, but I want this to be in the spec, even if it's commented out, so the reviewer could verify it is correct. > - HACKING and TODO are missing from %doc, possibly also NEWS, but this one is > very outdated > > Both of these are not useful at all in a non-devel package, I'd say. As long as we have no devel package they should be in the base package I think. The main problem I see is that you rewrote the spec and based your review on the rewrite. This renders the review pretty useless because nobody will realize his own errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
