Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Mamoru Tasaka <mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.bad...@gmail.com --- Comment #36 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-06-07 11:03:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > == Vendoring Boost > > We actually use a modified version of Boost, so Phusion Passenger will not > compile against a stock Boost. I understand your concerns with regard to > security, but please rest assured because we fully understand the security > implications of vendoring a library. We will take full responsibilities for > any > security problems; that is, we will either backport security fixes or upgrade > our vendored Boost to a newer version. > > I hope this addresses any concerns that you might have with regard to > vendoring > Boost. If not then I'm eager to hear your thoughts on it. CC-ing to Toshio. Would you comment on this issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
