Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #10 from Jindrich Novy <[email protected]> 2009-06-22 04:20:32 EDT --- The best solution seems to be to add lzma-compat package where all the lzma stuff from xz is shipped. It doesn't need any modifications on lzma side. Adding Obsoletes/Provides to the compat package just obsoletes lzma, not lzma-libs or lzma-devel so all dependencies on liblzmadec are kept. Check out the new packages: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/xz/xz.spec http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/xz/xz-4.999.8-0.5beta.fc11.src.rpm Asked upstream about the lzmainfo: 18:33 < jnovy> Larhzu: Hi Lasse, is it intentional that lzmainfo equivalent is missing from xz? 18:35 < Larhzu> jnovy: For now, yes, but there will be "xz --list" like gzip has, and I guess I can add lzmainfo for backward compatibility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
