Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844





--- Comment #9 from Roland Wolters <[email protected]>  2009-06-23 15:11:19 
EDT ---
Hm, the source is however distributed with the GPL2 license text, and all
source files say GPLv2+, so I went for that instead of the text on the
homepage.
Also, cddaheaderwidget.cpp is GPLv2. So what is the correct license for the
spec file?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to