Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510038 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola <[email protected]> 2009-07-08 04:54:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This is a mock review. I do not have permissions to approve the package: > > MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the > review. OK > > rpmlint -i SPECS/python-icalendar.spec > SRPMS/python-icalendar-2.0.1-0.1.fc11.src.rpm > 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. You didn't run it on the binary package: [jzleh...@politzer result]$ rpmlint python-icalendar-2.0.1-0.1.fc11.* python-icalendar.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. (Also, if you run rpmlint on the srpm it already includes the spec file.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
