Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506355 --- Comment #2 from Bill Nottingham <[email protected]> 2009-07-10 15:30:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > $ env LANG=C gcc -c TEMP.c > In file included from TEMP.c:1: > /usr/include/munge.h:39:4: error: #error By linking against libmunge, the > derivative > /usr/include/munge.h:40:4: error: #error work becomes licensed under the terms > of the > /usr/include/munge.h:41:4: error: #error GNU General Public License. > Acknowledge by > /usr/include/munge.h:42:4: error: #error defining the GPL_LICENSED > preprocessor > macro. Hey, can we patch this out? 1) It's terribly passive-aggressive, and I think our code shouldn't do that 2) We don't do this in any other libraries; we assume users can figure out licensing on their own 3) It's not even correct. a) the licensing only covers distribution. If you don't distribute, it doesn't really matter b) is that even a legally enforceable 'agreement'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
