Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 Tom "spot" Callaway <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway <[email protected]> 2009-07-14 17:13:16 EDT --- Okay, so there are two issues here: 1. Since the code in the tarball all says GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+, and the readme says GPLv3+ (one of them does, another one says GPLv2+), and the latest SVN code (not just the readme) says GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+, we should email upstream and ask them to correct the license attributions in the code in SVN, and once that is done, we should be fine to use License: GPLv3+. Otherwise, if you don't want to wait, use License: GPLv2+ now and update it when and if they release something with proper code attribution. 2. Patent issues. The only patents I'm aware of are around control point generators for stitching. This code does not seem to do that, it seems to use already created panoramics. Can you confirm that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
