Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512106 --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Suchý <[email protected]> 2009-07-17 04:34:21 EDT --- > BuildRoot used is archaic. Use It was one of recommended in Guideliness. But if you insist on the most prefered... Changed. > I still don't see why you would want to use "/usr/bin/docbook2man" instead of "docbook2man" I prefer full paths as it prevent path spoofing. Just my opinion. I'm not dogmatic about it. Changed. > License is GPLv2 not GPLv3. (Source code header is binding.) Since I'm upstrem, then what I want is binding :) Changed source header to GPLv3. Mention of GPLv2 was mistake. Update SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rpmconf/rpmconf.spec Update SRPM: http://cloud.github.com/downloads/xsuchy/rpmconf/rpmconf-0.1.6-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
