Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512217 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Underwood <[email protected]> 2009-07-17 13:02:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Also, while I realize that Jochen requested the release number to be > > rewound to > > 1, it's a little bit disingenious to remove the changelog attribution to the > > work done by Pierre Yvess and myself in generating the spec file prior to > > review. It doesn't actually matter to me, and may not matter to Pierre > > either, > > but in general you shouldn't remove record of people's work as it might > > affect > > their employment when they work on things for Fedora as part of their day > > job. > > Say I was asked by my boss to package geany plugins and work on getting it > > into > > Fedora. If he looks now, it looks like I didn't do any work, and I get the > > sack > > (ok, this isn't a real example, but you see my point). > I definitely see this point. Please note that it was not my intention to be > disingenuous. My idea was to leave the fedora review and the changelog as it > was > with Pierres and your work. Since Jochen told me to start with review 1 I was > not sure what the right way was. Well, probably a better option is just to keep the changelog entries in the spec, but change the release numbers to 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
