Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-21 08:41 EST ------- Well, (In reply to comment #7) > This is owned by kdebase, hence I should add it as Requires Is kdebase required only for the dependency for /usr/share/config.kcfg/ ? Actually I don't use KDE and currently I don't have kdelibs installed. However, this package seems to work well (at least by checking: ktechlab examples.circuit and examples.circuit is from http://ktechlab.org/screenshots/ ). So, if it is only for the ownership problem that kdelibs should be required, I think that /usr/share/config.kcfg/ should be owned by ktechlab, too and kdebase should not be required. And.. > gputils for assembly: > KTechlab provides integration with gputils for quick assembly and testing of > progams. Well, this means that it is _useful_ that KTechlab is installed together with gputils, however, this does not mean that KTechlab is completely unusable without gputils? For me, executing "ktechlab examples.circuit" seems to work without gputils . Well, I cannot judge correctly if this is working as you desired, however, at least ktechlab seems to launch normally and read circult correctly. IMO, the explicit dependency for gputils, gpsim can be removed. Also, check for BuildRequires and something else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
