Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510865 --- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <[email protected]> 2009-08-04 07:28:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a > duplicate. OK > MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used > consistently. NEEDSWORK > - If you use tabbing, do it properly: remove the extra space from Summary, > Version, Release and so on. There only tabs. On case mixing it, rpmlint comply it. > - There is no comment on what patch0 does. Ok. I comment it. > - Fix the buildroot as per comment #5. It was already done. > MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. ?? > - Upstream website is down. I known. :( What you can suggest do with that? Must I "fork" project to continue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
