Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513420 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert <[email protected]> 2009-08-04 09:54:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > It's not, which is why it's wrong. I see. I don't want to argue, but both the tarball and the package are not capitalized ether. > It's not anything like Totem in terms of features, Agreed > and the only somewhat GNOME-y dependency is GConf. Please don't forget gnome-themes (why?) and control-center and evolution-data server (through totem-pl-parser) plus all their deps. Totem's dependency chain is rather long, at least in Fedora. I will change summary and description as soon as somebody picks up this review. P.S.: Bastien, would you mind replying to bug 488558, which is in NEEDINFO for 6 more than 6 weeks now? TIA! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
