Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Fabian Affolter <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #15 from Fabian Affolter <[email protected]> 2009-08-04 17:24:36 EDT --- Thanks for your help. (In reply to comment #13) > An initial review. Mostly looks good. Just some rpmlint bits to cleanup as you > previously mentioned. > > + rpmlint output The rpmlint output now [...@laptop09 i586]$ rpmlint sugar-record* sugar-record.i586: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities sugar-record.i586: E: no-binary sugar-record.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/sugar/activities/Record.activity/camerac/camera.c 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. I removed the embedded gst stuff and added it as a requirement. Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-record.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-record-64-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
