Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=514342 Mamoru Tasaka <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <[email protected]> 2009-08-13 03:58:46 EDT --- Approving, provided: - Please add the following text file as %doc: http://codeforpeople.com/lib/license.txt (In the spec file add this with _full URL_ like ------------------------------------------------------------------ URL: http://rubyforge.org/projects/codeforpeople/ Source0: http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem Source1: http://codeforpeople.com/lib/license.txt ... ... %install rm -rf %{buildroot} mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{gemdir} ... ... install -p -m 644 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/ ... ... %files ... %doc %{geminstdir}/license .... ------------------------------------------------------------------ - If we say "the license is the same as Ruby's", on Fedora this means it is licensed under "GPLv2 or Ruby" (on Fedora "Ruby" license means the lines below "or the conditions below:" of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt), so please change the license tag to "GPLv2 or Ruby" (not GPLv2+ or) ----------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-fattr) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
