Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516114


Paul Howarth <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|[email protected]    |[email protected]
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth <[email protected]>  2009-08-19 11:36:55 EDT 
---
I'll review this one since I had a look at an earlier submission (Bug #494219)
and when the submitter of that one lost interest I had a go at packaging it
myself (Bug #518046). There may be some mileage in merging our efforts
actually.

First looks:

 * shouldn't the tarball name have _r5836 rather than _r0?
 * is the git-core dependency a remnant of starting with the spec file for the
git plugin, or is there some actual reason for having it?
 * the package description could list a few extra features such as allowing
users to change their passwords
 * the setuptools regression mentioned in the comments has been fixed in F-11
so that comment could be removed
 * there is a patch available in svn trunk for
http://trac-hacks.org/ticket/4125 (it's in my package from Bug #518046).
 * please include sessionstore_convert.py script (see
http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/[email protected]/msg03696.html)
 * it's safe to use --skip-build as EPEL-4 doesn't have trac >= 0.11 so there's
not likely to be an EL-4 branch of this package
 * the noarch/sitelib comment from the python spec file template can be dropped
I think

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to