Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493013 Jussi Lehtola <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola <[email protected]> 2009-08-26 18:30:08 EDT --- > (In reply to comment #4) > > > SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files > > from > > upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK > > - License text is not included in the tarball, please ask upstream to > > include > > it. > > I guess you did not see the file LICENSE that is also included in %doc. Whoops, sorry. ** If the binaries work in Debian with just a brute-force rename, then it isn't an issue in Fedora. (No interlinks between them and so on.) ** You can still drop PREFIX=%{_prefix} from the build phase, it's only used by the install target of the makefile. Do before import to CVS. This package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
