Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515832 Mamoru Tasaka <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[email protected] |[email protected] Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka <[email protected]> 2009-08-31 12:57:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Replaced use of %makeinstall. I got that from the Fedora examples. I'm > getting rather irritated by the Fedora documentation being contradictory and > out of date for package building. If you find something contradictory on Fedora documentation, please notice it on fedora-packaging mailing list. For -2: * Packaging structure - If you want to split binaries under %_bindir into a subpackage, usually such subpackage is named as "-utils" on Fedora. * About make install - I still recommend to add 'INSTALL="install -p"' option to 'make install' to keep timestamps on installed files (especially on header files to be installed) * Documents - You don't have to include a document file to all subpackages. - Including license text (in this package "COPYING") to the main package is rather mandatory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
