Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518017 Remi Collet <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet <[email protected]> 2009-09-11 10:15:26 EDT --- REVIEW: :) rpmlint is silent php-pecl-sphinx.src: I: checking php-pecl-sphinx.x86_64: I: checking php-pecl-sphinx-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. :) package name :) spec file name :) package must meet the Packaging Guidelines (PHP, ...) :) license approved (PHP) :) license match upstream :) no license bundled by upstream :) specfile legible, english, UTF8 :) sources math upstream d5bd7c00a8e036d7f82e98ebb0d9b210 sphinx-1.0.0.tgz :) build on F-11 x86_64 against PHP 5.3.1RC1 :) build on mock (F-11 i386) :) BR ok :) no locale :) no shared lib (php extension are not "real" shared lib) :) own all directories that it creates :) perms ok :) %clean section :) consistently use macros :) contain code :) no large doc :) run without %doc :) no -devel, .pc needed :) no GUI :) not own files or directories already owned by other packages :) %install, with rm -rf :) extension (un)registration ok (pecl list) :) final Requires /usr/bin/pecl libsphinxclient-0.0.1.so()(64bit) php(api) = 20090626 php(zend-abi) = 20090626 :) final provides php-pecl(sphinx) = 1.0.0 sphinx.so()(64bit) php-pecl-sphinx = 1.0.0-2.fc8 php-pecl-sphinx(x86-64) = 1.0.0-2.fc8 So : APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
