Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #38 from D Haley <[email protected]> 2009-09-12 03:58:08 EDT --- Response from upstream: > On the still continuing package approval process for Fedora, the licencing > issues have been re-raised. > > Namely, the copyright included with the mathGL spec is not internally > consistent. > > The COPYING file is GPLv3, the COPYRIGHT file is GPLv2 and the source code is > \"version 2 or any later\" > > Is it possible to clarify in the source repository, exactly which licence is > intended? Yes, it should be GPL v.2 or later (as in source code) -- I forgot to change COPYRIGHT and COPYING :( I think that is now quite clear :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
