Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: piklab - Development environment for applications based on PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208250 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-29 04:16 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > The problem is to know if I have to add this BR or if this BR is missing in > a > > package from which pikloop depends. > > piklab of course :-) Well, configure requests the existence of -lcurses. in FC5, this is in ncurses, which are installed by minimal buildroot. However, in FC6, libcurses.so is moved to ncurses-devel. So you have to add ncurses-devel to BuildRequires and the problem for rebuilding is resolved. I have not yet reviewed this fully, however, * rpmlint complaints about long summary. It says that summary should have no longer than 79 characters. * Please add "ncurses-devel" to BuildRequiers (this should be no problem for FC5, too). * Perhaps /etc/security/consoles.perms.d/ should be /etc/security/console.perms.d/ ? (the latter is owned by pam) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
