Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #28 from Thomas Janssen <[email protected]> 2009-10-02 05:26:15 EDT --- Ok. Did some minor spec changes like ($RPM_BUILD_ROOT to %{buildroot}), converting to tabs instead of spaces. Added Requires pkgconfig. Noted the rpmlint output after installation to upstream: http://www.rocklinux.net/pipermail/stfl/2009-October/000115.html Waiting for answer there. According to some threads from IIRC fedora-devel ML, is "W: undefined-non-weak-symbol" not a blocker criteria. Though i will take care that it gets fixed. By the way, the libstfl.so is linked against libncursesw.so At least according to the Makefile: export LDLIBS += -lncursesw >From my understanding. Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/stfl.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/stfl-0.21-2.fc10.src.rpm [tho...@tusdell SPECS]$ rpmlint stfl.spec ../SRPMS/stfl-0.21-2.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/stfl*-2* 7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1723919 I'm already sponsored. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
