Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: typepad-motion - A microblogging application for 
building online communities

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527319

           Summary: Review Request: typepad-motion - A microblogging
                    application for building online communities
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: [email protected]
        ReportedBy: [email protected]
         QAContact: [email protected]
                CC: [email protected], [email protected]
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion.spec
SRPM URL:
http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/typepad-motion-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1729590

[sebast...@localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -vi typepad-motion-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 
typepad-motion.src: I: checking
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[sebast...@localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -vi
typepad-motion-1.0.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 
typepad-motion.noarch: I: checking
typepad-motion.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-httplib2
You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded
explicit Requires: tags.

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.

Does this need to be fixed? I'm asking since it's written in Python...
This package also requires python-oauth and django-flash, which have both been
submitted for review.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to