Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523650 --- Comment #22 from Thomas Janssen <[email protected]> 2009-10-11 15:33:47 EDT --- [tho...@tusdell ~]$ rpmlint srpm-review-test/qmpdclient.spec srpm-review-test/qmpdclient.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 48, tab: line 1) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [tho...@tusdell ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/qmpdclient-* qmpdclient-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [tho...@tusdell ~]$ rpmlint -I empty-debuginfo-package empty-debuginfo-package: This debuginfo package contains no files. This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, rpmbuild not being able to strip the binaries, the package actually being a noarch one but erratically packaged as arch dependent, or something else. Verify what the case is, and if there's no way to produce useful debuginfo out of it, disable creation of the debuginfo package. That's what i get after i recompiled your package and run rpmlint on it. Installed package is rpmlint clean. I have to say that my only idea is, to ask upstream if it's known or how to get the debuginfo out.. Maybe one of the other reviewers is able to help out? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1741049 -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
