Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <[email protected]> 2009-10-13 18:52:12 EDT --- Builds fine in mock/F-10/x86_64 $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-x86_64/result EMBOSS-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation EMBOSS.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/emboss.sh EMBOSS.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/emboss.csh EMBOSS-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libeplplot.so.3.2.7 e...@glibc_2.2.5 EMBOSS-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. According to licensecheck from rpmdevtools, files in scripts/ plplot/ ajax/ and some files in jemboss/ are missing licensing information. Please upstream to add appropriate license headers to these files. MD5 checksum OK: 6c5163c571bc0be94d64420ce0d71824 EMBOSS-6.1.0.tar.gz Please add comments explaining the purpose of each patch and if it has been sent upstream. Other than that, this package looks fine and is APPROVED. Thanks for your hard work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
