Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 Charles Lopes <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?([email protected]) | --- Comment #13 from Charles Lopes <[email protected]> 2009-10-14 10:08:56 EDT --- Updated versions of the spec and srpm files: http://sites.google.com/site/tjarls/fedora/opennhrp.spec http://sites.google.com/site/tjarls/fedora/opennhrp-0.11-3.fc11.src.rpm Detail of changes: * The startup script checks the /boot/config-`uname -r` for CONFIG_ARPD=y and bails out when not found. * Changed the "Requires" into a "Conflicts" ipsec-tools < 0.8. The use of ipsec-tools >= 0.8 fells under the "Optional Functionality" case. Opennhrp can be run without ipsec-tools although the user would need to write its own script as the two ones shipped upstream use ipsec-tools. Please note that the 0.8 branch of ipsec-tools is not ready for production use. I made some tests with alpha snapshots but I would not recommend using it yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
