Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527488 --- Comment #36 from Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <[email protected]> 2009-10-15 13:57:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > > As it stands, would you now consider the package mature enough for sponsor > review? Yes.. I was completing the runtime tests right now: /dev/drbd0 on /mnt type gfs2 (rw,relatime,localflocks,localcaching) cat /proc/drbd version: 8.3.4 (api:88/proto:86-91) GIT-hash: 792e28fe8928ff72c706e0a8fdbbcc10e36bbf3c build by [email protected], 2009-10-15 19:14:04 0: cs:Connected ro:Primary/Primary ds:UpToDate/UpToDate C r---- ns:0 nr:6553364 dw:6553364 dr:204 al:0 bm:400 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 ep:1 wo:b oos:0 One small note, doesn't require neither a new srpm or a new spec for this review, the default config file is a placeholder to point to the documentation. This is fine, but it points to the wrong directory. /usr/share/doc/drbd/drbd.conf vs /usr/share/doc/drbd-utils-%{version}/drbd.conf :) IMHO it's good enough to go through a sponsor review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
