Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530021 --- Comment #5 from Alex Lancaster <[email protected]> 2009-10-25 15:24:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > What's the use of splitting this into two packages? Only for building the > plugins or can the moovida-base package actually be used without movida? > Even without splitting the package I cannot see the dependency loop: The > plugins BuildRequire the movida package, but at runtime movida requires (at > least) some plugins. So where is the loop? Note the difference between > BuildRequires and Requires here. I'm not the maintainer (I just posted the review to start the rename reviewing going) so I don't know exactly why this is necessary (hopefully Matthias will chime in soon), but I will point out that this was the way that it was done when the package was called elisa. I believe this split also mirrors the way gstreamer is split: gstreamer, gstreamer-plugins-good, -plugins-bad etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
