Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530743 --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway <[email protected]> 2009-10-29 10:05:37 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text "If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. If the source package does not include the text of the license(s), the packager should contact upstream and encourage them to correct this mistake." It is explicitly (and intentionally) not mandatory. I would encourage you to note in the spec file (in comments) the licensing situation and breakdown. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
