Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521719 --- Comment #9 from Ruben Kerkhof <[email protected]> 2009-11-11 12:29:16 EDT --- I talked about the license with the author of pycryptopp a while ago. He removed mars.cpp from the upstream tarball, since pycryptopp doesn't use that and it had an incompatible license. Since we're linking against cryptopp in fedora, and don't use the embedded version in the upstream tarball, I think we're good. I added a clarification to the specfile. New version: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pycryptopp.spec http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/pycryptopp-0.5.17-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
