Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 Jens Petersen <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[email protected] |[email protected] Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen <[email protected]> 2009-11-14 07:12:35 EDT --- Thanks for the update and continued effort on this package. I think we are getting nearly there. :) (In reply to comment #22) > The intention was GPLv2. The license block in the Cabal says GPL, but > the License file it points at is the GPLv2. Likely Neil (the author) is not familiar with the Fedora's distinction of GPLv2 vs GPLv2+, > but I will try and find what > the Haskell/Cabal approved way is to mark GPL versions in the license > field. AFAIK there isn't one :-( so we should probably complain to cabal/hackage about it, and request adding of GPLvN but getting it fine-grained enough for Fedora will probably be hard I suspect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
