Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529374





--- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp <[email protected]>  2009-11-25 
04:53:02 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Actually ethos is fine because that's what the upstream name of the project 
> is.
ACK. There is no rule to name a lib lib*

> The README file states that it uses the LGPLv2.1 license and doesn't state 'or
> later versions' hence the reason the + wasn't added. 
> I believe this is correct.
The README file? Please look in the COPYING. This is the file to figure out the
correct license. 

> # Tarfile created using git
> # git clone git://git.dronelabs.com/ethos
> # git archive --format=tar --prefix=%{name}-%{version}/ %{git_version} | bzip2
> > %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
> %define git_version 9d3aae9
> %define tarfile %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2  
This part is okay, but not what she meaned.
Josephine, if you create this tarball you get another md5sum. But this is
normal.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to