Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541491 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Kent <[email protected]> 2009-11-30 04:33:29 EDT --- Spec URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SPECS/rubygem-ruby_parser.spec SRPM URL: http://magoazul.com/wip/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby_parser-2.0.4-2.fc13.src.rpm (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > What's the correct approach here, %exclude the script? Add a note about it > > and > > leave dependencies as is? > > > > Will go on the assumption you'd rather it be excluded. > > - If you are sure that no one would need this script, then simply > exclude the script. However if there may be some people who wants > this script, rather leave this script as it is (and also leave > the dependency as it is). Those who want to use this script can > install the needed dependency by him/herself > ( note that I don't know how this script is to be used, so I would > keep this script as it is ) Yeah I suppose I can't be certain no one would use it. I'll leave it in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
