Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761 Michael Terry <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Michael Terry <[email protected]> 2009-12-07 20:21:45 EDT --- Hi, I'm the maintainer of deja-dup and saw this via google alerts. :) First, thanks so much for creating the spec! I've long wanted deja-dup on Fedora. However, I notice that the spec requires vala, and you comment on needing vala to rebuild the SRPM. You *shouldn't* need vala to build deja-dup from a tarball. You *do* need it to build from bzr. The tarball includes the vala source, but also already includes the generated C code. If you patch the vala source in the tarball, then you will need valac because the C code will be out of date. But you can patch the C code instead to avoid that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
