Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546169 Kevin Kofler <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler <[email protected]> 2009-12-13 18:10:08 EDT --- IMHO, this should be packaged, and in a way to Obsoletes/Provides: libtar as it's backwards-compatible and actually actively maintained unlike libtar. The Obsoletes/Provides should of course be versioned, so if a new libtar springs up at a later point (i.e. if the maintainer really goes back to actively developing it), it can be introduced instead of or in addition to the fork. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
