Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547993 Mamoru Tasaka <mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org |mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-12-20 11:40:51 EDT --- Well, ? About Source1: - I checked http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/downloads/index.html , however the license of Source1 seems unclear. Would you ask upstream? - While Source0 is 128K, Source1 has 6.0M (50 times the size of Source1) and as a result while jconvolver binary rpm has 6.4M its debuginfo rpm has only 48K. Is Source2 always needed for jconvolver? Also are there any reason behind that jconvolver and -reverbs are not seperately packaged (into rpm)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
