Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544628 Thomas Spura <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |544629, 544630 AssignedTo|[email protected] |[email protected] Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura <[email protected]> 2009-12-21 07:37:37 EDT --- Review: Good: - license ok - name ok - buildroot ok (unneeded in fedora) - parallel make - %clean section there - %files section ok * owns all directories it creates * requires d-bus for one folder - buildrequires/requires ok - builds in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1882908 - noarch not possible - no *.la files - no shared libs - %doc ok Needswork: - URL still wrong, see comment #1 - from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Libexecdir 'Packagers are highly encouraged to store libexecdir files in a package-specific subdirectory of %{_libexecdir}, such as %{_libexecdir}/%{name}' - What's the status of the xslt script? ############################ Please fix the url; subdirectory of %{_libexecdir} and 'Is programm working as expected?' are just 'should' items. ############################ APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
