Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553055 --- Comment #6 from Jeroen van Meeuwen <kana...@kanarip.com> 2010-01-08 11:14:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I am a bit confused about this package, the only file I need from > gpxe - bin/undionly.kpxe - is not included at all. > I'm sorry, I wasn't aware that file was actually valuable. > As you said default config is Fedora specific, would it make sense to > call the package including that config gpxe-fedora instead? > In that case, the gpxe package itself would basically be empty. I'm not objecting, but it would mean that for the gpxe package itself to be any good it would maybe also need to require the -fedora sub-package? > I feel a better description text and addition of a README.fedora explaining > stuff is needed. Sure, any suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
